Subject: FZ Bible - PDC Final 16 Lectures 13/18
Date: 3 Feb 2000 11:09:25 -0000
From: Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (FZBA Scandinavia)
Organization: FreeZone Bible Association of Scandinavia
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

PHILADELPHIA DOCTORATE COURSE, FINAL 16 LECTURES
- PART 13 OF 18

Brought to you by:
FreeZone Bible Association of Scandinavia

*Please see Part 00 for the Introduction & Contents

===================================================

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

===================================================

SUP 8
SOP 5 LONG FORM STEP IV - GITA (continued)

Philadelphia Doctorate Course
21 January 1953

[Start of Lecture]

This is the second part of the evening lecture of January the
twenty-first, continuing on Step IV.

Step IV as given in the Short Form can be followed exactly and in
a short form. But here's some additional information born out of
experience in its use.

What is an object? An object is an area of particles in a
condensed space. Value -- aberratively -- is determined, to a
large degree, by its density and its aesthetic. There is lead,
which is almost as dense as gold, but it is gold which holds the
eye. It's almost as if one mass of particles says "Have not," and
another mass of particles says "Have." And those two masses of
particles will go together with great ease.

Black and white consist of black equals have-not, white equals
have. A mass of white particles -- colored perhaps slightly --
say "Have," and a mass of black particles -- equally dense --
will say, "Have not." You get these two masses into conjunction
one with the other, and you get a flow.

The problem of flows is the problem of terminals. And to have a
flow you have to have one terminal which is a have terminal and
another terminal which is a have-not terminal. Now this black-
particle idea and the white-particle idea are very fascinating,
subject to a great deal of controversy. Anything that's subject
to that much controversy isn't there, believe me. But people who
are short on space have assigned a high value to some object.

Value on an object -- either to have it, or a have-not value
(that is to say, it's dangerous is a have-not value; it's
desirable is a have value) -- gives an equal amount of fixed
attention. In other words, one can fix his attention on a
dangerous or undesirable object and fix his attention upon a
desirable or helpful object equally. That's quite interesting,
isn't it? They have two different effects, however. The have-not
tends to come in on the person and the have tends to leave.
There's a difference of behavior.

Black and White Processing is creating an interesting flurry in
the States. (They finally learned about it in the county next to
Phoenix. Word goes awfully fast.) I saw quite a bit of
correspondence, one way or the other, about it. Auditors writing
auditors with stunned exclamation points in their letters and so
forth: Black and White Processing works! Well, of course it
works. The funny thing -- it's very old now, very old.

When you size up the whole problem of terminals, you're sizing up
the problems of locating terminals. And why do you locate things?
That's because you conceive them to have a value or not to have a
value. That is to say, they -- a value, then, as dangerous or a
value as helpful, or a value as undesirable or a value as
desirable. So a person locates masses of black and masses of
white on the track; and you'll find him desperately holding on to
one or the other. He'll be concentrating on one because it's
terribly dangerous (black) and he'll be concentrating on white
because it's very helpful and aesthetic and desirable.

You'll find a preclear, every once in a while, floating around in
a cloud. He gets these white particles and he feels very peaceful
whenever he can float around in this cloud. And then he -- all of
a sudden, he isn't floating around in the cloud. He's in a black
mass or something.

Well, if you turned a person around on this evaluation and made
him believe that everything white -- everything white was
enforcedly and have-to-be kept and desirable and everything black
had to be gotten rid of, you'd get him quite upset.

Now you could turn him around the other way and make him believe
that white is something you got rid of and white was really
dangerous. That's by making white objects hurt him, you see, like
-- there's your electronic incident. White is desirable, but it
hurts him. And black is something desirable, because you can get
lost in it and nothing can find you in it. And you'll find him
holding on to black and trying to get away from white, but
white's really desirable so he really wants white. There's your
big maybe.

Well now, you'll get all sorts of manifestations in the body. You
have various areas of the body which a preclear will conceive to
be white and conceive to be black. If you have a preclear who has
been in communication rather continually with another being, and
he's had a flow between himself and this other being --
communication lines -- one fine day he loses this other being:
What's he do? He needs two terminals. The basic unit of this
universe is two. You've got to have two terminals. Well, so he
makes two terminals in his own body, and you get the basis of
schizophrenia. And he can see his body as being white and black,
and then he'll start seeing other bodies as white and black --
half-white and half-black. And he'll put his hands together and
he'll get a discharge from his right hand to his left hand and so
forth. You get this -- he'll compartment up his own body in order
to have two terminals, you see. All of this is -- tells you that
there's an upset about particles in space; that's really all it
tells you, and that's all that's important about it.

And the way to undo the upset is to get a person into a position
where he's able to use anything for an anchor point or get along
without any anchor points. And then he's completely free to have
space.

And how do you cure him, then, of bad anchor points (you know,
condensed space where pain existed and he wasn't supposed to have
it and he didn't desire it) or holding on to good anchor points?
How do you cure him of this? By drilling him with every
conceivable kind of an anchor point. Starts out with the old
home. You get him so he can handle all known kinds of anchor
points. That goes into houses, of course. He'll know all kinds of
houses and he'll drill with these houses, and that goes into all
sorts of things that you can use.

But basically all these things are energy, aren't they? An object
is condensed energy. This is nuclear physics. Anything converts
and gives off energy and so forth. An object -- a solid object --
is a relative term that goes from all space with no particles in
it as not solid, but the second you got two particles in it you
have the first definition of object showing up. So you could have
a billion cubic miles of space with two particles in them, and
you could call that an object. Or you could have one cubic
centimeter with ten to the ten-billionth power particles in it,
and you could call that an object.

So the definition of object is kind of slippery, isn't it? But it
does tell you this: that you desire your preclear to go up scale
in terms of objects. So your bottom-scale processing would be in
terms of what we call, in common parlance, solid objects; from
that up to loose fluids, liquids -- unsolid objects. See? That's
starting in there around 20. Bodies in action around 20 are very
unsolid; they're unsubstantial. And a body which you would mock
up initially and originally would probably be very, very
unsubstantial. Your mock-ups as you start on the track are quite
unsubstantial, and then they get more and more substantial.

Now, of course there isn't any particle there; there really
isn't, but there's a terrific agreement on the existence of these
particles and there's all sorts of things that are agreeing that
they are things and that they are foisting off on you the idea
that they're objects and so on, and everything's got this in it.
And there are some of them are saying "Have not," and some of
them are saying "Have," and you can get very much bogged down in
all this. And it all -- at IV, V steps, it's just a horrible
confusion really.

At IV it's not too much of a confusion. By the time a guy gets to
Step V, which is Black and White Spot Control, boy, he's really
in a confusion. "Objects, what are they? Are these anchor points
from the past or are they mine or are they somebody else's?"
Everything is hanging up on everything else, and you're getting a
terrible snarl. And the keynote of that snarl is there's no space
in which to unsnarl it. Everything has to be in this small area,
because there really isn't any space.

You get some preclear at IV Just to hold his eyes out in front of
him. You see, he could do that very easily at III; he could hold
any anchor point out in front of him. (That's a test: Can this
person keep an anchor point stable, and can he perceive it
clearly? And then he goes ahead with Spacation. But at IV this
thing is erratic.) Well, you make him hold his eyes out in front
of him eight yards or something; make his eyes go way out in
front of him, just hold them there. Ooooooooooooh. Just horrible
things will happen to him. He gets somatics and he gets all sorts
of things, because you're telling him to change his space.

Well, it's very odd that you can take a person at IV and make him
change his space that easily. The consequence of changing his
space carries with it an enormous amount of liability in terms of
somatic.

A somatic is occasioned by two particles in proximity to each
other in such a way as to make an undesirable condition. A
somatic and pain basically is a concept, not an actuality, but is
occasioned first by the concept that there are particles -- that
there is space and that there are particles and then these
particles are too close together, and that it'd stop because
these two particles can't be shifted anymore. You get pain as a
result of that.

So he's in a condition there where when you tell him to handle a
couple of particles, anyway he handles these particles he's
liable to get pain. And the reason why he doesn't want to handle
particles is when he handles them he gets pain. That should be
very clear to you.

You start a person at IV, and particularly at V (much worse than
IV), and start him handling particles and if you make him persist
in handling particles and having them appear far apart or far
away or something on that order, he's going to hurt. It won't
kill him, fortunately. If he starts to believe that it's going to
kill him and that it's absolutely certain, he's at V. And if he
can do it and you still have a live body on your hands, he's at
IV. This is an empirical test which is not recommended in
auditing.

Now, why couldn't the whole universe fit in your head? It can. It
can! How would you make it fit in your head? Well, make a fellow
see his eyes out there at -- first at eight yards or -- first at
two feet and then at eight yards and then out there a couple of
hundred yards and start stretching his eyes out to infinity, just
mock his eyes up out there. You'll get some interesting results,
as a matter of fact.

You see, he's in his head and it's an area of condensed
particles, and a body is very valuable because of its
condensation of particles and also because of its mobility and a
lot of other things.

When you first start doing this he'll set up flows, because he is
fixated on locating things in space. He has got -- just got to
locate things, that's all; he's just got to. And the keynote of
this is he's been convinced there's a scarcity of particles, so
he's holding particles together. And below that he gives
particles away because he's in apathy, because he knows he can't
hold them. (All this is covered in the Philadelphia Tapes.)

So what do we find? We find the concept of scarcity underlying
this. There's too much scarcity about this. There's so much
scarcity about that, that one -- there's so much scarcity about
item X, that one would waste it and throw it away before he would
consume it. Can you imagine anybody with that idea of scarcity?
Yes, well, you'll see it show up in a preclear. It is so valuable
that he's just in such utter apathy about it, that if he got it
he just might as well throw it away because it couldn't be
anyhow. And the only way you can convince him that it is, is let
him do what he would normally do with that article; that's waste
it.

If you gave somebody down here -- if you stopped somebody on the
street and gave him a hatful of diamonds, they probably wouldn't
consume them in any fashion or other. They probably wouldn't sell
them or get money from them or do much of anything else. They'd
probably kind of go and give them away and maybe they'd give them
away to the damnedest things, or they might even go and dump them
in the sink. (I don't know whether you could make a test on this
or not. I couldn't afford to just now. But you'll see this work
out in processing.)

You'll find a person, for instance, is -- well, let's take an
actual case: Let's take milk. A person has an idea of milk --
couldn't drink milk. This person's got a little bit of an
allergy, and they can't drink milk. That isn't because milk's
dangerous, it's because milk's too scarce! It's awfully valuable;
it's white, isn't it? And it's just so scarce that they just --
you'll find out that they -- you first give them some milk, and
they can eventually get some milk as long as you'll let them pour
it down the sink. And then you can give them some milk, and
they'll give it to everybody else in the house. And everybody's
got to have milk, and then you can provide milk and you can have
tank cars coming up full of milk in mock-ups and, oh boy, do you
have to start laying it on. And finally you're able to get them
to take one drop of milk themselves. It's so valuable that they
couldn't possibly consume it. Got one drop of milk; then they can
take a glass of milk. Then finally you can have everybody starve
to death because they have no milk and there's just one glass of
milk left in the world and it's sitting on the table in front of
them, and they'll drink it. You go up higher up the tone scale,
they say, "Well, I'll just create more milk." You get the
manifestations of give and take there; there are particles,
there's a fluid.

Now, you start in on a fluid on a person who is pretty far down
the scale, and you're going to have a rough time. You've got to
start out on this person with objects. You start handling fluids,
you start handling particles that are loose and with space
between them, and they can't handle space so they're going to
have a hard time handling this. So you start in the theory -- not
otherwise on these tapes -- the theory on Step IV, in Give and
Take, is: Get particles in solid form and handle them, the
solider the better, and then graduate from that to particles in
looser form. This would mean that you would wind up with this
person handling gases.

If you give somebody at V -- and you start giving them Give and
Take too quick and you tell them, "Get air," you will practically
kill that preclear before you're through. You're asking him to
reach for an object which is at 20.0 on the tone scale. It's a
fluid; it's even a fluid to the point where it's an invisible
fluid. And there, they just get in terrible condition trying to
handle this fluid, just grim. Air. You'll have them lying there
and gasping.

You say, "Put some air in your lungs. Now let's get the idea of
air and put some air in your..." I won't do it to you. You'll
have to have them mock up big machines and tanks and containers
and domes that seal in air and all that sort of thing, and you
start that process of Give and Take -- giving away air and taking
in air -- and they'll practically gasp themselves into oblivion.
You'd be quite amazed. That's because it's a fluid.

You start in with milk on this preclear: No. No good; no good at
all.

So, what? They will consume an engram -- solid object, close-
packed particles -- before they will consume flowing energy. It's
interesting, isn't it? That tells you that somebody at a low IV
or V, VI and VII, when they start to pick up energy, will allow
themselves to have only the least desirable and most solid form
of the actual energy which they conceive themselves to be
surrounded by. They'll give it away if it's good energy, and
they'll take it if it's bad energy. So you'll find these people
will just wallow in engrams. You start showing them up engrams on
the track and, my God, they'll pick up more engrams in less time,
and they'll get more and more and more engrams, they'll get
heavier and heavier and heavier engrams. You start giving them
flows and they can't handle a flow too well and the flow... They
can feel these flows running.

Why are they feeling a flow? Because they're at a level that'll
handle a solid object, not a level that'll handle a fluid. And it
has to be a fluid to flow.

Now, you get the gradient scale? Down 0.0 you've got the solidest
kind of a solid object there could be, and just a little bit
above that you have a less solid object and above that you have a
less solid object. (This is a have or have-not object.) And a
little bit above that you have even a less solid object, have or
have-not, and above that -- and finally you get up, well up, and
you start to get fluids. Gaseous objects.

These people will favor clouds and that sort of thing. They're
not at 20.0 when they start favoring clouds, by the way: that's
still a pretty hard-packed object.

You want to make a preclear good and sick at 4 or 5 on the tone
scale? Start him handling -- and by the way, you can do this
technique and should -- start him handling vials of energy,
little vials of energy. Evidently somewhere on the track somebody
convinced us that capsules of energy were terribly important. The
preclear would get inside of them as a thetan and be surrounded
by energy. "Oh boy, lots of energy!" And go on a big binge.

Well now, your give-away case, you can create those vials in them
and give them away. He can give them to everybody, he can waste
them, he can throw them away, he can do anything with them. Now,
you'll find that when he creates it, the energy might be nice and
bright red or nice and bright green. Here's a vial of energy;
good, solid, good sensation in it and everything else. Sounds
wild, doesn't it? It'll make your preclear sick as a cat. And he
can get this vial of energy all right, and it'd turn black. The
second it comes into conjunction with use, it turns black and
gets kind of solid. He's bringing it down tone scale. Now a
person could have consumed enough of these vials of energy to be
himself a black mass of burned-up energy. He's got the idea that
energy burns up, you see? And so he then can't be reached anymore
by this energy.

Well, you can make him create the energy and give it away. Or you
can have the thing box these vials. This is important: vials of
energy on Give and Take Processing. It produces an astonishing
result on your preclear. Vial of energy.

So you have him mock all these up, if he's low on the tone scale,
and give them away and have them taken away and thrown away and
wasted and anything else. And he'll finally get up to a point
where he can't get enough energy. Then he'll start to take them
in. And then you've got to mock up all kinds of energy vials and
capsules and tanks and so forth around him in such a way that he
can take in this energy, and finally he'll get up scale to a
point where he doesn't care to bother with it anymore.

A preclear who cannot himself generate energy is up against this
one, that he thinks he has to be given energy to consume it and
he thinks the energy belongs to somebody else and he thinks it's
some kind of an object (particle mass) that he has to consume. As
incredible as that one may seem, it is the basis on the thirst
for a preclear to run electronics. You'll have preclears that'll
have an absolute thirst for electronics, and they'll have an
absolute thirst for running engrams. They would prefer to run a
bad engram with lots of somatics in them to none at all. They
would -- they would rather, rather than leave engrams alone, they
would rather run a black engram. They are just on that level of
energy consumption, don't you see?

Bad energy is better than not having any energy. And they're at a
level that has to take energy in a solid form.

Now, basically, food, diamonds, money, bodies, houses, anchor
points are energy particles. So you're working up to the point
where your preclear can consume exteriorly created energy or
create energy and give it away in terrific abundance. And if you
want to cure scarcity along any lines of objects or fluids or
items, so forth, get up there and cure energy. Until they are
convinced that there is an abundance of energy through mock-ups,
they are going to contract their space down in order to make sure
they have energy particles, And they themselves will hold that
space contracted.

Why? To hold on to energy, because energy is valuable. And the
harder packed it is, the more valuable it is. And the harder
packed the have-not energy is, the more dangerous it is. And they
will get to a point where they will take this hard-packed, black
energy and they will use it in which to hide themselves; and they
will use it in all other forms, and so on.

But we have what? We have a psychosis (and I use that word
advisedly) in any Homo sapiens at whatever step or whatever level
of the tone scale on the subject of energy particles. And that
psychosis, the desire for these energy particles, makes him
aberrate the only thing which permits him to be: space. He will
abandon space, because he's already on a give-and-take basis on
space to where he will waste space or give it away or not use it.
So space just ceases to be important to him to the degree that
energy's important; and if he has to choose between not having
any space and having some energy particles, believe me, he'll
choose the energy particles. He's at that level on the tone
scale. And there's Homo sapiens, right there, bang!

Now, Give and Take Processing then works toward curing -- now
Spacation, at Step III, gives the person space. And Step IV,
GITA, Give and Take, works to disabuse him of any necessity to
have an energy particle of any kind whatsoever; and it does it by
mocking up things and giving them to him and having -- that is to
say, having him mock up things and take them in and then mock up
being given all these things and mock up wasting them and mock up
having them and mock up hoarding them and mock up, until he
finally gets the idea there's an abundance of energy particles.

Of course there's an abundance of energy particles: Good God,
there aren't any, so how could there be anything but an
abundance? And so a person on something that doesn't exist can be
completely convinced either that it is terribly abundant or
terribly scarce.

Capitalism can exist only by spreading and utilizing the theory
of scarcity. It moves on that basis, it's its modus operandi. And
that's what your red hot finds wrong with capital. He doesn't
quite know what's wrong with capital, but he -- but he knows that
every time capitalists go around, why, everything gets scarce.
And he objects to that, rightly or wrongly. And so he gets down
on capital. Capital always cuts its own throat, always. There
will -- inevitably in any society where capitalism takes hold,
there will come a time when they're mowed down in mounds, just as
happened over here in Germany not too long ago. It did happen
over there. The state, all of a sudden, became the only
capitalist. They said, "This is an awfully good business. We're
going to create the only existing scarcity."

The effort of a state toward socialism is the effort of a state
to cure itself of scarcities. And the only thing that defeats
socialism is the perpetuation of a scarcity by a few. In order to
do what? In order to control. If you can create a scarcity, you
can control. Therefore, all socialistic principles are fought
violently, with blood, by anybody who is trying hard to control,
because they can only control by bringing about a scarcity.

I don't mean to turn this into a political rally or a Hyde Park
talk. But when you see what the philosophy of scarcity can do to
a preclear, I'm afraid your politics are going to do a sudden
level-out. I won't say they'll level out at socialism or level
out at communism or level out at anarchy or level out at
capitalism or level out in any ideology that we have had before.
They're probably going to level out into good sense, and then we
will have for the first time a workable political system. One
doesn't exist at this time, by the way. There's no such thing as
an even vaguely good, self-perpetuating political system. Every
one of them contains enough flaws in terms of scarcity and
control to spin itself in. There are some much better than
others. And those which seek to get a people to provide for the
people have a better chance of survival than those which seek, by
a few amongst the people, to create a control of the people by
creating a scarcity amongst the people -- have a lower survival
value.

There are many levels of these things on the tone scale. And to
start talking about politics and then go off into a description
of existing ideologies would be very silly. But to start talking
about the relative scarcity or abundance and the idea of scarcity
or abundance held by a government will tell you immediately what
the tone level of that country and what its future will be. You
can guess. You know where it's going to change, if you know these
factors.

Now that becomes important to you in a preclear, because your
preclear is essentially a government of a very vast number of
subjects. And when those subjects are out of line, they're in bad
shape and this preclear's in bad shape and he doesn't get free of
these subjects; he is trapped by these subjects, these cells.

Once again we're talking right along with Book One, Dianetics:
The Modern Science of Mental Health, about the reactive mind.

What's the reactive mind? It's in the cells. That's right. What
are the cells? Well, they're evidently sentient beings at such a
vast and astronomically large number that it would stagger you if
you tried to interfere with all of their functions and regulate
each one of them personally. But you can command them as a whole.
Your ability to command that group is your ability to be, your
ability to provide space. And you yourself, actually, are a
political leader.

What is your political ideology towards your body? That is
established by: How much scarcity and how much abundance do you
allow this body? You see, you could bring a body under control by
creating a scarcity. That's possible: food dieting very often
does this. But it shouldn't be looked into any -- much further
than the creation of a scarcity -- a selective creation of a
scarcity.

You get somebody and you want him to slim down. Well, do you know
that you could diet somebody who was fat and make them much
fatter? They're fat on a give basis. They're fat, they've
collected all these things, they've held all these things and
then they've lost too much in life; and so they've just gone into
apathy on holding, and they'll waste everything that comes into
them. They'll get fat. And you could feed them less and less and
they conceive there's more and more scarcity, and so they get
fatter and fatter.

Another person a little bit higher up the tone scale, you start
taking the rations and shoveling them into him with a steam
shovel and they get thin. Why?

They get disabused of the idea there's any scarcity of this
stuff. So they say, "Well, let's just get on about our business.
Get organized. There's no reason to be upset about this."

Now you're doing that in processing, with a preclear. Your goal -
- your goal is to cure them of any idea of scarcity or abundance
of energy. I mean, just blanketly. Cure them of any idea of
scarcity, because it's a concept and an idea and it's an
aberrated one.

At IV your goal is to disabuse your preclear of any idea that
energy is a vital thing to his being. Because it isn't. Beingness
is space, it isn't energy. You want to know, How can he be
interested? I told you once before: it's the conflict between
having an audience and not having an audience, not having to
bother about bodies and bothering about bodies; and on that cross
it sort of sticks as a maybe.

But do you know that you can -- you can take sensation as a
concept, not as an energy flow? And do you know it's a higher
sensation as a concept? What's the most exhilarated you've ever
been in life? It's probably the moment you had an idea about
something. Well, brother, I'd like you to find me some energy
particles in that one.

What's the most excited an artist ever gets? Does he get that
excited -- does he get that excited because of sex, because of
something or other? No, he doesn't. As excited as he gets about
the great picture which he's going to paint. He doesn't even see
it yet; he hasn't even mocked it up. He just got this idea he's
going to paint this great picture. And there it is. And he's
going to... No energy particles in it.

Where do you get this "Sensation is energy particles"? That was
the first lie.

Now therefore, Give and Take first addresses -- for the person
low on the tone scale -- solid objects and moves as fast as
possible into fluids and moves as fast as possible from just
general fluids into energy itself. And just Give and Take, in any
way that you can get up there to processing out this thirst for
energy and desire for energy and desire for particles and desire
for -- and inhibition of particles and enforcement of particles
and energy flows and so forth.

Why do you smoke? Very simple. I smoke because it amuses my
cells. If I disabused them of the idea of energy, I wouldn't have
any body.

And your eyesight is so darn bad! For instance, you think I stand
here on a stage and lecture to you. If you brought in somebody
off the street, he'd swear I was here on this stage. I'm not even
vaguely here. But if I knocked out -- if I knocked out desire for
energy out of the body, it'd be very amusing: I wouldn't have any
body. Because these cells would all suddenly say, "Anchor points,
anchor points? Well, they drove in my anchor points. And what the
hell's going on here? I mean, I didn't have any anchor points to
drive in. How interesting. You mean I've got nothing here but
space? Oh, that's beautiful. I think I will go be a Texan, or
something." And one of the liver cells would leave and so on.

I mean, frankly it sounds very extreme, very amusing to you. But
that smoke that comes out of that cigarette looks very like the
first energy in which you were paid, way back on the track. It
looks very like it. Just get the idea of sitting in the midst of
beautiful pyres of smoke as they come up. You know, you could --
you could do that for a while and you'd get sssshllp! Oh
wonderful, wonderful!

Now, you know that. And when you smoke it doesn't matter whether
you're -- by the way, a fellow conducted a test on this one day.
He put a whole bunch of people in a tank, great big tank, and
cleared all the air out of the tank and made nothing but fresh
air in the tank and then gave them pipes and gave them cigarette
holders, all empty -- they put them in their mouths -- and then
pumped warm air in so that we had a pool of warm air in the
center of the tank, and then shut off the lights. And there
wasn't anybody in there couldn't tell he wasn't smoking. It was
an actual test that was made. And then he varied it in such a way
as to give some of them actual smoking equipment and some of them
not actual smoking -- they couldn't tell the difference. Nobody
could find out whether or not he was smoking the second the
lights went out.

So, if you don't think -- if you don't think that smoke is an
illusion: a blind man, for instance, seldom gets much pleasure
out of tobacco; he can't see it. So if you think the poison
contained in the nicotine does something or other and so on --
no, it doesn't do anything. You can put ten times as much
nicotine or one-eighteenth as much nicotine; you'll do the same
thing.

What is the effect? The effect is to tell the cells, "Energy is
exterior to you and energy is here and it is coming in through
the body and is present here, and therefore you're under control
because you're dependent on exterior energy to yourself. So don't
go generating any." And naturally, a person very often will start
to smoke and get terribly tired. Get up bright, fresh, cheerful
in the morning, ready to lick the world, you know? Reach over
there, get that cigarette, light it. Nnyrrrrr!

Quite often the preclear has never added these things up. Why
does his perceptic level go down right after he lights that first
cigarette? It's energy, that's all. It's telling him that energy
is exterior to him and that he is fed energy. And it keys in the
earliest part of the track and the earliest part of one's
beingness, just to that effect. Energy is exterior, and you've
got to took elsewhere for sensation than in yourself. Of course,
you don't look "in" anything for sensation.

Do you know the -- one of the most delightful experiences is
recovered in Step III? We're not without sensation, slap-happy
material here, by the way. There is plenty of dynamite in
Standard Operating Procedure Issue 5. You just run it off in its
short form, and you'll see some of the doggonedest things happen
to a preclear and he will get the strangest sensations and
adventures.

You start III. Possibly it's the first peace or happiness which
this person has experienced for years, he will find by doing
Spacation in Step III. He creates some space, and there's nothing
in it. Boy, that's really wonderful. This is the sensation he's
been striving for and looking for for just ages, and suddenly
there it is. Interesting. If he does a good Spacation, that's the
sensation he gets out of it: peace, abundance, timelessness; it's
all very fine. As a matter of fact you could probably go off and
leave him there on the couch in that piece of space and come back
hours later, and he's still perfectly happy about it.

If he's nervous or restless about it, he hasn't created any. He's
got particles all over the place and he's got flows, and the
anchor points are unstable and so forth. In other words, you
tried to do Spacation with a fellow before you did IV, and IV or
V was desperately necessary on this preclear before you did a
Spacation. You have to cure him of energy particles and the use
of energy particles and the scarcity of energy particles before
you can start getting him to construct very much space. See?

He'll hold on to those energy particles and pack them in tight.
And you notice this person assigns values in the strangest ways.
IV and V, it will be values assigned in various ways. You'll have
the darnedest time processing him.

Take money, for instance. You can start giving somebody GITA on
money and, boy, you'll have to have him mock up the whole room
and the whole street and give him the deed to the United Kingdom
before you can make him burn a ten-shilling note. And then he
finally will burn this mocked-up ten-shilling note. That's
fascinating. And then maybe you can make him burn the second one.
After you have filled up all the cargo ships in the Thames with
money and he's made sure that they're all full of money, he'll
get that next.

Money could be called an attention unit of the society. It flows
through the society and is sort of mocked up; they're really
attention units that flow through the society. If you don't
believe that: you want to make a lot of money, just attract a lot
of attention. Of course, if you attract the attention on the
have-not basis, everybody will take the money the other way. But
that's all right.

Now, concentration of attention is concentration of a particle.
What's attention? We've always talked of attention units. Any
time a person fixes his attention strongly and irrevocably upon
something, there are particles involved, and the first
manifestation of them are particles which are anchor points. So
you cure people of anchor points, you cure people of particles.

Low-level material, then, as it goes up the line, takes a hold of
solid objects without too much -- any more attention to anchor
points than those which are actual MEST anchor points, like the
front doorknob and the newel post at the end of the steps and
that sort of thing. They're really solid MEST objects, and those
he is using for anchor points. And then as you go on up the line,
by the time you get him disabused of the ideas of energy he will
start using a particle only when he wants an anchor point. And
then he can get particles and scatter them around and use them
along that line. His entire evaluation of existence will change.

Your preclear who is at IV and at V is at a stop. Now, he's out
of space, in other words, and his space is pretty jammed up.
That's stop. You wonder why he's stuck on the time track? Well,
there's no other space to be in, and there's a scarcity of what?
Scarcity of space. So therefore there's a scarcity of beingness,
isn't there? And you've got to go up through and cure a scarcity
of beingness before you get this person up there to a line where
he is perfectly free to be many of himself. The only really safe
thing to be, hanging around a universe like this, would be a
couple of thousand people.

Don't think, by the way, if you were in good shape that you
couldn't monitor a couple of thousand people at the same time.
You wouldn't have to have them in a regimental front anyhow,
either. You could, if you wanted to. It would be amusing, for a
Saturday afternoon anyway.

Now, your road then on GITA is a simple one. And it's anything
that shakes him loose from anchor points on the idea that the
particles are more important than the space.

A person at IV and V thinks the particles are important, the
space isn't important. His whole attention is on particles. A
person who can have a III done on him still thinks space is
desirable. A person at IV doesn't think it's too desirable. He's
wasting it, or he's got it jammed completely, or he doesn't think
about it at all. And it would be a brand-new thought to him,
maybe, when you start in working with GITA and you say, "All
right. Now let's mock up women. Start mocking up women now. All
right. Let's mock up a few hundred women, a few thousand women.
Let's just mock up a few more women and..."

The guy says, "I... I don't know, I... I can mock these women up
all right. I get several of them, but I... I don't know, they
just seem stuck right there."

Well, that is a condition that isn't covered in the other tapes.
The normal course is that he can mock up women and stuff them
into his body and his place of his body, and he can mock up women
in his body and have them walk out away from him; or she can mock
up men and stuff them in as though she were the man, and so on.
And just on and on and on. Or turn around and make them walk
away, and they just go on walking away. That'd be a very, very
smooth-working case on GITA.

The next level that you run into, of trouble, is they start --
you have mocked them all up and you got a lot of them packed in,
now you make them walk away and they get out there a hundred feet
and they can't go another step. This fellow can't get a woman to
walk another single step beyond a hundred feet away. All the way
around him in a circle he only lets a woman get a hundred feet
away from him, and that's as far as she'll go and he can't make
her go any further. So you obviously got to have more women. And
if you mock up enough women, or enough men, you'll eventually get
where he'll let one of them walk away. You've mocked up 8,675,000
women, and he will finally let this worn-down old hag with no
teeth wander off.

Now, he'll get them out there, if he's on a take basis, and he
will get (or she will get) this person -- a person will come
within about -- well, he'll let them get within about fifteen or
twenty feet and then he can't get them any closer than that. They
don't stick there: I mean, he can get them walking out again or
he can get them out further, he can get them walking out easily;
but when he turns them around to make them walk back toward him
again they just don't come in, that's all. Well, the thing there
is you just haven't given enough of them away, you haven't wasted
enough of them, to prove to him that they exist. So you just
waste a lot more. All right. And have a lot more walk away, until
they can walk in.

Now, there's a condition that is not mentioned (it was sort of
understood that it exists): it would of course be, if you had an
inflow -- which is a take -- and an outflow -- which is a give --
you'd also have a null. You'd get somebody who would get them
stuck someplace. When he could mock up women, he would get them
along a certain line; and they wouldn't move in, and they
wouldn't move out. That's a null: gets no action.

Well, technically, this doesn't fall into Step IV. That
determines a Step V. He can't make these women walk in, he can't
make these women walk out. Or she can't make the men walk in or
can't make the men walk out away from them. They just stick. If
he gets them they stick, that's the end of that. Of course you
haven't got any motion possible there, have you? So this person
is more thoroughly stopped and is even more out of space than a
person at IV, so that falls into the category of Step V.

So when you start to do GITA and you get this -- you get this
manifestation -- you're using these objects, and you're creating
and making women walk in and creating and making men walk in,
you're creating castles and having them move in and move out; and
as long as a person can move in or out these things and getting
them on up the line and get things more and more fluid, more and
more fluid -- of course, a house, you see, and castles are very,
very solid, so that's one of the first things you start in on and
that's why the step leads off with a house. You get them way on
up, you'll eventually lead them right straight on out by handling
energy. And they handle energy -- I don't care whether that's in
terms of explosions or otherwise; you don't have to worry about
that. It's just their desire for energy and their desire not for
energy, and you may put the energy in capsules and you'll get the
doggonedest reactions you ever heard of. You cure them of energy,
in other words.

All right. Now we start in this preclear at IV and we've got an
additional test. Yes, he can mock up his home, he can really
change it just a little bit.

Now we say, "Now, move it!"

Mm-mm. It doesn't move. We can't move it a few inches to the
right and a few inches to the left, and we can't move it in
closer. Uh-uh. We've got a V. Now, you need that datum, because
it's not elsewhere in the tapes.

What is the difference then between a IV and a V? The ability to
move something, the ability to get things to move. Give and Take
Processing falls into a null with this person, and these things
do not move after they are mocked up. Ja wohl! Very simple.

So we get into a V. And the V is the case that can't move
anything anywhere, or things have a very definite tendency to
stick and stick very hard and stick very solid. And where it
comes on a case level that you've got one of these sticks, of
course, what have you got? You've got a stop. This person is even
further out of space than somebody that can do GITA; they're
really out of space. What is -- what is stop? Stop is no more
space. Stop is also stuck, and stuck is also no more space. And
stuck is also no more beingness. So you have -- this person has
an awful time recalling or getting reality on any past.

You get a person who is really badly upset about maybe he didn't
ever live before or did, or he's got these engrams and he can run
them but he doesn't see them and so forth. You've got somebody
who stops very easily on the track. This person gets started, by
the way, he has a hard time of it; he doesn't want to get
stopped. He has an anxiety about being stopped because he knows
what happens if he gets stopped, even in conversation: he's dead.
Stop is death, and that's the end of that. So any kind of stop
becomes death. Well, this fellow probably dies a hundred times a
day. And that's cured in V. We're not taking up V just now. This
is the case where everything is stopped. "You can't move a mock-
up" could be the definition of V.

IV, then, on this rundown that I've given you here, is IV on a
Long Form. And this includes cycle of action. See, it includes
anything -- any step -- that would get a person to handling
energy particles easily.

Cycle of action. The reason why a person is stuck is because he's
stuck on cycles. He started a cycle of action and he couldn't
finish it, so he's still stuck there. Well, if he's at a IV he's
going to get stuck there, and he's probably got that stuck
somewhat in restimulation. And along the whole track, then, he's
strewn with failures, stops. Stopped where he shouldn't have
stopped; he didn't complete any cycle of action. And in trying to
complete the cycles of action and so on, he gets stopped some
more.

Now he gets to a point where he won't start, really, a cycle of
action. He knows he'll get stopped before he starts. And as such
he'll get quite upset if anything slows him down or stops him to
any degree.

Furthermore, he's trying to finish off, if he's doing anything, a
half a hundred cycles of action or more, which were begun at God
knows what points. The service facsimile, then, boils down to
"the computation Which permits one to pretend he has finished
some cycle of action." It would be what he uses as a
dramatization, rather than finish some cycle of action or rather
than finish cycles of action. He does something else than finish
cycles of action. The service facsimile would be the excuse as to
why he didn't complete a cycle of action. So that you can find
his service facsimile chains are all these failures that he's
using to explain why he fails -- which would be the chain of
failures go into restimulation when ever he can't finish a cycle
of action.

Now, you find a preclear then getting restimulated, particularly
at those times when they are unable to complete a cycle of
action. What is restimulation? A restimulation is a recalled
association on not having finished a cycle of action. He recalls,
because he doesn't finish some minor cycle of action here in
present time -- he's just realized that he hasn't finished that
cycle of action -- it calls into effect then all the cycles of
action which he hasn't finished. And he has all these
explanations worked out in the past as to why he hasn't finished
these cycles of action; and so he calls into existence in the
present the reasons he hasn't finished these cycles of action,
and then it's all explained and understood. Then he gets into
trouble with the service facsimile is because it's no explanation
at all. Everybody challenges it, and he gets upset about it.

Sounds confusing to you? Well, that's what the service facsimile
is: a flock of confusions about cycles of action. If you're
confused about it that -- you've got the definition.

Now, I haven't mentioned before the value of a particle or what
you did with a particle or what an anchor point was, until this
talk tonight, to any great degree. Now, I've defined anchor
points very widely, but not as a particle. An anchor point is a
particle. And all the particles you have, have been anchor
points. There is no particle except a particle which has been an
anchor point.

All objects, then, are composed of anchor points which have been
drawn together. When something is drawn together in such a wise
as to hold, you get some position or other on the tone scale. And
when you get a solid object, you get one position or other on the
tone scale. And they will be ridge positions.

What is a ridge, then? A ridge is a mass of anchor points which
have dragged in just so far and are at one or another ridge
levels of the tone scale. You will find some ridges which are
nothing but pure, unadulterated hate; they're just held right
there. Most of the ridges are apathy; they're in and out, and
they're held there. And some of the ridges are conservatism; and
they're particles which are held right there. In other words, you
get these harmonics on the tone scale would be the various tones
of where ridges have been formed by people having anchor points
out and then dragging them in suddenly.

Well, this happens then that when one's attention is violently
shifted from out to in, he goes down tone scale; and when his
attention is shifted from in to out, he has a tendency to go up
tone scale. Simple mechanism, isn't it? It really is -- it is
that simple. It's just that simple. And he, of course, used
anchor points to make space, so when he dragged in his anchor
points he had less space. That's why objects are solid. And if he
drags in enough anchor points, there's enough memory of anchor
points dragged in or put out, piled up in one place, he gets a
solid object. That's how you get objects, and that's what the
universe is composed of.

Now, are anchor points sentient? Well, they're composed of
thought. "I thought you were there; therefore, you're there. I
think, therefore I am. Well, an anchor point is, therefore it
thinks."

I mean, if you want to -- you want to mess that one up that way,
that's very interesting. That tells you that an atom is probably
sentient.

What's an atom? An atom is probably an anchor point. Not my
definition; it's some such thing. I don't care how you work this
out according to an atom either. Physics doesn't agree with
chemistry on nuclear physics and chemistry doesn't agree with
physics on nuclear physics, so I don't see any reason why
Scientology has to agree with either one. That would be a good,
safe thing to be -- a nice little anchor point, way disassociated
from all other anchor points, living a sort of an independent
life and thinking one's own thoughts. After all, there's no such
thing as size.

When you create something, you are the one who gives it a
beingness. That beingness is as much as you give it. I don't know
how much beingness that is (neither do you). So I don't know how
much beingness is in an anchor point (you don't either). Nor do I
know how much beingness would be in an atom. But there would have
to be some beingness in an atom if it were created; no matter
what tiny little amount, there's some beingness. Therefore, there
appears to be a considerable beingness to the MEST universe. It's
made up of points which were created by beings and which demarked
a certain area of space.

You're getting into data now, you see; and you start getting up
toward the top of the tone scale on data, and all we're saying is
"There are postulates." And now you can make a postulate this way
and a postulate that way and if the two are not in agreement
that's your hard luck, not mine. And you had to make a postulate
which didn't agree with another postulate so that you'd get
enough interplay to have a confusion that would stick.

So the highest level of object would be that -- I mean, the
greatest duration of object would be that object which was most
in conflict with itself in terms of maybes. If you really got
something in terrible conflict with itself so that it was just --
and then condensed way down in terms of space, you'd have
something that would endure forever. The dream of Egypt was
eternity. Examine its politics. Becomes very fascinating.

Anything which wants to endure for a long, long time, build
solidly, thinks in terms of "Get nice, solid matter and construct
it very solidly. Put it all together in such a way that it will
last." So, in order to do that you just have to have lots of
maybes. Interestingly true.

[End of Lecture]
